3 Comments
Mar 4·edited Mar 4Liked by Liam Sturgess

The CHRC says 'reasonable limits can be imposed'. Does the CHRC have any duty to assess if an imposed limitation of one's human rights are reasonable, and by what standards or parameters does it make such an assessmenent; or do they simply accept that the human rights violation of itself is always justified and ignore that question unless the human right at issue involves the accommodation of a protected characteristic?

Expand full comment
Mar 4Liked by Liam Sturgess

Should not more records exist regarding the actual meeting with the CSC entity.

Consider also an FOI to Correction Services Canada to shed more light on the letter whose content has been redacted. For instance for all records Corrections possess regarding meetings with the CHRC.

Expand full comment
Mar 4Liked by Liam Sturgess

Good for you to put teeth into this outrageous practice of redactions in tandem with gross human rights abuses.. makes me hotter than a hornet these Public SERVANTS imagine they rule us!!

"In what appears to be a draft Frequently Asked Questions page, the CHRC asserts that vaccination requirements do not “violate human rights principles” because “rights are not absolute.” The CHRC explains that “reasonable limits can be placed on our rights when it applies to public health and safety,...." Preposterous loophole for tyranny on demand!

Expand full comment